Saturday, September 17, 2011

Week 3 picks

Colorado St. +7.5

Mississippi St. -2

Temple +3

Georgia Tech -15

Friday, September 9, 2011

Saturday NCAA games

East Carolina +17.5

Arkansas -35

Oregon -26.5

Purdue v. Rice OVER 51.0

No. Illinois -5.5

Stanford -20

Saturday, September 3, 2011

NCAA SATURDAY

MIDD TENN ST +16

BOISE ST. -3

COLORADO ST. -6.5

UCLA  +2

SO. FLORIDA +10.5

TEXAS V. RICE OVER 55




Thursday, September 1, 2011

2 Plays Tonight

Wake +6.5

Utah -30

Blueprint to successfully betting college football courtesy for covers.com by David Payne

Dearly beloved and degenerates,

We are gathered here today, on the opening week of college football, to mourn the loss of one of the game’s most generous men, the honorable Jim Tressel.

For the past decade, few coaches put more money in gamblers’ pockets than Tressel, bless his little red sweater vest.

Jim was a man of integrity and impeccable scruples … when it came to covering the spread and his players’ tattooed backs. His Buckeyes exceeded the betting market’s expectations 61.8 percent of the time with a classy 76-47 record against the spread during his 10-year tenure. He was money in Big Ten play (48-30-2 ATS) and when coming off a loss (13-5 ATS). Jim was certainly a giving man.

We’ll miss him, but, like all great leaders, he would want us to move forward.

So let’s go get some free tattoos and gamble.

Welcome to Cram Session 2011.

DP’s Blueprint to Successfully Betting College Football
BET ON

• The over in Rice games: Owls’ games have eclipsed the total in a ridiculous 69.3 percent (70-31) of the time since 1999.

• The eventual national champion: The last 11 BCS champs went a combined 92-42-2 ATS, with only the 2007 LSU Tigers finishing below .500 against the number.

• South Carolina at 20/1 and Virginia Tech at 45/1 to win the BCS title: Then hedge when they get in the mix late.

• Virginia Tech in November: The Hokies under Frank Beamer are a ridiculous 22-4 ATS in November since 2004.

• Oregon at home: The Ducks are 25-9-1 ATS in Autzen Stadium since 2005.

• TCU in MWC play: The Horned Frogs are 31-13-2 ATS in conference play under coach Gary Patterson.

• The over in conference play: In the past five seasons, the under has cashed 52.73 percent in conference games.

BET AGAINST

• Oregon State in September: The Beavers are 8-19 ATS in the first month of the season under Mike Riley since 2003.

• Home underdogs: Home-field advantage is over-valued in college football. Last season, home dogs covered only 44.06 percent (115-146-6) of games.

• LSU in SEC play: Les Miles is 15-31-4 ATS in conference play at LSU.

• UTEP in November: Mike Price-coached teams are 22-48-1 ATS in the month’s final season.

TEAMS WITH THE BEST PLAYERS

The folks at NFLDraftScout.com and The Sports Xchange ranked the top 750 NFL prospects of 2012. Here’s a look at the teams with the most NFL talent).

Miami – 15: How many of them are eligible come kick off is up in the air.

Wisconsin – 15: If Russell Wilson was the missing piece, the Big Ten is over. No other Big Ten team has more than Penn State’s 11 draft prospects.

Alabama – 13: The Crimson Tide’s opening opponent, Kent State, has two NFL prospects.

Virginia Tech – 13: Lot of hype about the Hokies being a real sleeper this year.

Clemson – 12: Surprisingly talented, the Tigers will be waiting for Florida State the week after the ’Noles host Oklahoma.

Georgia – 12: Plenty of dynamic playmakers on both sides of the ball, if they can stay healthy.

Missouri – 12: All that’s lacking from the team with the most NFL prospects in the Big 12 is an experienced QB.

Notable: Duke has seven NFL prospects. Auburn has four.

12 MONEYMAKERS

When betting against 10 percent juice, anything less than a 52.4 winning percentage will cost you money. Sharps and pro bettors shoot for between a 55-57 percent success rate. But 55 percent for a recreational gambler is a legitimate goal.

Since 1999, 12 teams have covered the spread in 55 percent of their games:

1. Boise State: 62.67% (89-50-3)

2. Oregon State 60.70% (82-54-1)

3. Connecticut: 60.0% (72-46-2)

4. Oregon: 58.45% (83-59)

5. Ohio State: 58.21% (85-60-1)

6. Iowa: 57.63% (83-59-2)

7. Utah: 57.24% (79-57-2)

8. Virginia Tech: 56.95% (86-65)

9. TCU: 56.33% (80-61-1)

10. Navy: 55.88% (76-61-2)

11. Hawaii: 55.24% (79-63-1)

12. Boston College: 55.17% (80-65)

10-WIN ATS TEAMS

Since 1997, 18 teams have finished a season with 10 or more ATS victories. Twelve of the 18 began the season unranked. Five began the season ranked in the Top 10, and only one began the season ranked No. 11 to 25.

Eleven of the 18 teams of the 10-ATS-win teams came from BCS conferences.

BAD NEWS

“Overall, college football has been pretty good, but that's not necessarily because we had good numbers. We've had a real trend of top teams going down week after week that just jolted the Favorite/Over pack of bettors. Maybe there's been a little parity, I'm not sure about that though. All I know is college football has been very unpredictable and that's always good for the bookmaker.” – Pete Korner, founder and head oddsmaker at The Sports Club in Las Vegas.

TEAMS THAT WILL BE FASTER

Clemson: New offensive coordinator Chad Morris has installed an Oregon-like tempo that helped produce 130 plays in the spring game, up 22 from last year’s spring scrimmage.

Pitt: Todd Graham brings over his high-octane scheme from Tulsa. Panthers’ quarterback Tino Sunseri threw for more than 400 yards in wet, windy conditions during the spring game.

West Virginia: Under the direction of Dana Holgorsen, the Mountaineers racked up more than 800 yards and 87 points in the spring game.

Arizona State: "We're at the point right now where I'm yelling at him to get the play in faster. The average speed I think of the quarterbacks (in Saturday's scrimmage) was right about 10 seconds after the ball was set and the whistle was blown." –ASU QB Brock Osweiler, who estimated that ASU was around 15 seconds last season in the Arizona Republic.
THE NUT QUESTION

If you can’t answer the following question, you’re going down this year – Why are you going to win more money betting college football this year than last?

“I worked harder than ever during the summer. Since there was an NFL lockout, I spent extra time in May, June and July updating and improving my power ratings, re-assessing coaching and player changes, while also reloading my database of Coaching Spread Patterns. Those three areas of work have me way ahead of the competition going into 2011.” – Covers Expert Steve Merril.

“In my view, confidence comes with preparation, experience and success, as it does with most activities or sports. My confidence that each season will produce good results is based on several years of long-term results and profits in 10 of 12 years and near breakeven in the two 'off' years.” – respected Covers.com forum handicapper nostradamus12.

“I'm not going to pass on games just because they look 'too easy'. Many of those 'easy' games tend to be just that, particularly early in the college football season.” -- Covers Expert Sean Murphy.

TRENDLESS HANDICAPPING

“Trust your eyes,” advises respected Covers.com forum capper Boom_Boom, who has won at least 25 units for eight straight seasons betting college football. “Most bettors try to find that ‘scheme or special trend" to help them wager from week to week. I do a ton of homework on college football as you can tell by reading my college football breakdown. But most importantly, I trust my eyes.”

Boom won 28 units on posted plays last season. I lost .01 units, going 23-21-2 in my Payneful Picks.

PAYNEFUL PICKS

Oklahoma -24 / Oregon -3 / Ohio State -33.5 / Troy-Clemson: Over 55.

Blueprint to successfully betting college football courtesy for covers.com by David Payne

Dearly beloved and degenerates,

We are gathered here today, on the opening week of college football, to mourn the loss of one of the game’s most generous men, the honorable Jim Tressel.

For the past decade, few coaches put more money in gamblers’ pockets than Tressel, bless his little red sweater vest.

Jim was a man of integrity and impeccable scruples … when it came to covering the spread and his players’ tattooed backs. His Buckeyes exceeded the betting market’s expectations 61.8 percent of the time with a classy 76-47 record against the spread during his 10-year tenure. He was money in Big Ten play (48-30-2 ATS) and when coming off a loss (13-5 ATS). Jim was certainly a giving man.

We’ll miss him, but, like all great leaders, he would want us to move forward.

So let’s go get some free tattoos and gamble.

Welcome to Cram Session 2011.

DP’s Blueprint to Successfully Betting College Football
BET ON

•    The over in Rice games: Owls’ games have eclipsed the total in a ridiculous 69.3 percent (70-31) of the time since 1999.

•    The eventual national champion: The last 11 BCS champs went a combined 92-42-2 ATS, with only the 2007 LSU Tigers finishing below .500 against the number.

•    South Carolina at 20/1 and Virginia Tech at 45/1 to win the BCS title: Then hedge when they get in the mix late.

•    Virginia Tech in November: The Hokies under Frank Beamer are a ridiculous 22-4 ATS in November since 2004.

•    Oregon at home: The Ducks are 25-9-1 ATS in Autzen Stadium since 2005.

•    TCU in MWC play: The Horned Frogs are 31-13-2 ATS in conference play under coach Gary Patterson.

•    The over in conference play: In the past five seasons, the under has cashed 52.73 percent in conference games.

BET AGAINST

•    Oregon State in September: The Beavers are 8-19 ATS in the first month of the season under Mike Riley since 2003.

•    Home underdogs: Home-field advantage is over-valued in college football. Last season, home dogs covered only 44.06 percent (115-146-6) of games.

•    LSU in SEC play: Les Miles is 15-31-4 ATS in conference play at LSU.

•    UTEP in November: Mike Price-coached teams are 22-48-1 ATS in the month’s final season.

TEAMS WITH THE BEST PLAYERS

The folks at NFLDraftScout.com and The Sports Xchange ranked the top 750 NFL prospects of 2012. Here’s a look at the teams with the most NFL talent).

Miami – 15:  How many of them are eligible come kick off is up in the air.

Wisconsin – 15: If Russell Wilson was the missing piece, the Big Ten is over. No other Big Ten team has more than Penn State’s 11 draft prospects.

Alabama – 13: The Crimson Tide’s opening opponent, Kent State, has two NFL prospects.

Virginia Tech – 13: Lot of hype about the Hokies being a real sleeper this year.

Clemson – 12: Surprisingly talented, the Tigers will be waiting for Florida State the week after the ’Noles host Oklahoma.

Georgia – 12: Plenty of dynamic playmakers on both sides of the ball, if they can stay healthy.

Missouri – 12: All that’s lacking from the team with the most NFL prospects in the Big 12 is an experienced QB.

Notable: Duke has seven NFL prospects. Auburn has four.

12 MONEYMAKERS

When betting against 10 percent juice, anything less than a 52.4 winning percentage will cost you money. Sharps and pro bettors shoot for between a 55-57 percent success rate. But 55 percent for a recreational gambler is a legitimate goal.

Since 1999, 12 teams have covered the spread in 55 percent of their games:

1.    Boise State: 62.67% (89-50-3)

2.    Oregon State 60.70% (82-54-1)

3.    Connecticut: 60.0% (72-46-2)

4.    Oregon: 58.45% (83-59)

5.    Ohio State: 58.21% (85-60-1)

6.    Iowa: 57.63% (83-59-2)

7.    Utah: 57.24% (79-57-2)

8.    Virginia Tech: 56.95% (86-65)

9.    TCU: 56.33% (80-61-1)

10.    Navy: 55.88% (76-61-2)

11.    Hawaii: 55.24% (79-63-1)

12.    Boston College: 55.17% (80-65)

10-WIN ATS TEAMS

Since 1997, 18 teams have finished a season with 10 or more ATS victories. Twelve of the 18 began the season unranked. Five began the season ranked in the Top 10, and only one began the season ranked No. 11 to 25.

Eleven of the 18 teams of the 10-ATS-win teams came from BCS conferences.

BAD NEWS

“Overall, college football has been pretty good, but that's not necessarily because we had good numbers. We've had a real trend of top teams going down week after week that just jolted the Favorite/Over pack of bettors. Maybe there's been a little parity, I'm not sure about that though. All I know is college football has been very unpredictable and that's always good for the bookmaker.” – Pete Korner, founder and head oddsmaker at The Sports Club in Las Vegas.

TEAMS THAT WILL BE FASTER

Clemson: New offensive coordinator Chad Morris has installed an Oregon-like tempo that helped produce 130 plays in the spring game, up 22 from last year’s spring scrimmage.

Pitt: Todd Graham brings over his high-octane scheme from Tulsa. Panthers’ quarterback Tino Sunseri threw for more than 400 yards in wet, windy conditions during the spring game.

West Virginia: Under the direction of Dana Holgorsen, the Mountaineers racked up more than 800 yards and 87 points in the spring game.

Arizona State: "We're at the point right now where I'm yelling at him to get the play in faster. The average speed I think of the quarterbacks (in Saturday's scrimmage) was right about 10 seconds after the ball was set and the whistle was blown." –ASU QB Brock Osweiler, who estimated that ASU was around 15 seconds last season in the Arizona Republic.
THE NUT QUESTION

If you can’t answer the following question, you’re going down this year – Why are you going to win more money betting college football this year than last?

“I worked harder than ever during the summer. Since there was an NFL lockout, I spent extra time in May, June and July updating and improving my power ratings, re-assessing coaching and player changes, while also reloading my database of Coaching Spread Patterns. Those three areas of work have me way ahead of the competition going into 2011.” – Covers Expert Steve Merril.

“In my view, confidence comes with preparation, experience and success, as it does with most activities or sports. My confidence that each season will produce good results is based on several years of long-term results and profits in 10 of 12 years and near breakeven in the two 'off' years.” – respected Covers.com forum handicapper nostradamus12.

“I'm not going to pass on games just because they look 'too easy'. Many of those 'easy' games tend to be just that, particularly early in the college football season.”  -- Covers Expert Sean Murphy.

TRENDLESS HANDICAPPING

“Trust your eyes,” advises respected Covers.com forum capper Boom_Boom, who has won at least 25 units for eight straight seasons betting college football. “Most bettors try to find that ‘scheme or special trend" to help them wager from week to week. I do a ton of homework on college football as you can tell by reading my college football breakdown. But most importantly, I trust my eyes.”

Boom won 28 units on posted plays last season. I lost .01 units, going 23-21-2 in my Payneful Picks.

PAYNEFUL PICKS

Oklahoma -24 / Oregon -3 / Ohio State -33.5 / Troy-Clemson: Over 55.

Free Opening Weekend Picks

I only like one pick tonight..

Wake+6.5

College football lines that make you go hmmm... - 08-30-2011

College football lines that make you go hmmm... - 08-30-2011

College Football Is Back!

Check back later for today's free picks.

Friday, March 25, 2011

I hated all the games yesterday and that saved us all some money... Here are my plays for tonight

2 games I really like..
Richmond   +11
Kentucky +5.5

Here's who I would take in the other games if I had to.

FSU -3.5
Marquette +4.5

Sunday, March 20, 2011

Friday, March 18, 2011

Updates Throughout The Day

Arizona -5
George Mason +1.5
UNLV -2

Va. Commonwealth +6

Last one NIT
Colorado -6

Friday, March 11, 2011

Thursday, March 10, 2011

Wednesday, March 9, 2011

Tuesday, March 8, 2011

3 Plays Today

NORTHERN COLORADO -5 This is a very big play!

Princeton -2.5
Dayton -2

Saturday, March 5, 2011

Thursday, March 3, 2011

Wednesday, March 2, 2011

Monday, February 28, 2011

Not much out there today.

The only game I would recommend is a small play

No. Colorado-7

They need to win this game to have a chance of hosting their conf. tourney.

Saturday, February 26, 2011

Wednesday, February 23, 2011

Saturday, February 19, 2011

5 NCAA Plays Today

Colorado +15.5
Princeton -7.5
Princeton Under 133
Portland -6
San Francisco +15

Friday, February 18, 2011

Monday, February 14, 2011

Sunday, February 13, 2011

Tuesday, February 8, 2011

Monday, February 7, 2011

2 Plays Tonight

These lines are tough today. I only have two small plays tonight.
Butler -17


New Mexico St. -10

Saturday, February 5, 2011

7 Plays NCAA

George Mason -4.5
UTEP               -3
Kent St.          -11.5
Memphis           +9
Colorado ST.  -4.5
Idaho               -4.5
Delaware        +3.5

Friday, February 4, 2011

Analyzing the Super Bowl XLV Line.

by Chad Millman


Analyzing the Super Bowl XLV line 

February, 4, 2011
FEB 4
12:08
PM ET

Aaron Rodgers, Ben RoethlisbergerUS PresswireThe Super Bowl is coming up. Which one of these guys do Vegas wiseguys like?
I've been trying to make these line moves columns during the playoffs extra special. Instead of just one guy firing off on several games, I've offered 360-degree views of each game by bringing in multiple voices. The idea was to show how very sharp bettors and bookmakers can see things differently, whether it's because of homemade stats, gut instinct or situations. Everyone has an opinion, but not everyone can be right.
And that is certainly the case for Super Bowl XLV. This line is tighter than an Aaron Rodgersspiral and has been from almost the moment it opened. That's what happens at this point in the NFL season. One game remains and it comes on the heels of nearly a month of high-visibility football. At this point, anyone betting anything worth moving the line has seen enough of the two teams to come to the same conclusion bookmakers did as soon as the AFC title game ended: The Green Bay Packers are a little bit better than the Pittsburgh Steelers.
When the line was first posted at Pack -2.5 (-110), sharp bettors jumped on it. They knew it wasn't going to get any better than that. And they were right: Over the past two weeks, the spread has pretty much hovered around Pack -2.5 (-120) or Pack -3 (+100). That also looks like this: Steelers +3 (-120), which means you are paying a premium to get the extra half-point for the Steelers. In fact, I'd venture to say most sharps have spent the majority of the past two weeks ignoring the sides and breaking down props. As Teddy Covers told me in a podcast this week, "We can sit out the BCS title game or the hoops title game, but sharps see too many opportunities in the props to walk away. I'll have 100 tickets in my pocket by Sunday."
Teddy told me about a great scene from this past Super Bowl cycle that took place at the Hilton, as soon as the props were posted on Thursday, Jan. 27. All over the floor were the bank wrappers that had been ripped from stacks of $100s that come in packs of $10,000. That's how excited the professionals were to make some bets on something other than the game itself.
Now, between my props podcast with Teddy and with Hilton bookmaker Jay Kornegay, my Right Angles props video, my props contest column and when I appeared on Simmons' podcast, we've had plenty of talk about which props sharps like, which provide the best opportunities and which ones you should avoid. It's time to break down the game.
One question I've been getting a lot this week is: With two such public teams, will this be the biggest-bet Super Bowl ever? The record for highest volume in the state of Nevada is $94M, set when the Steelers played the Seattle Seahawks, according to The Mirage's Jay Rood. Right now, he doesn't see that record being broken. "For one, the money line doesn't offer a great opportunity for someone to come in and bet $3 million to win $500,000. The odds on both teams are too low. That would happen at three or four books around town -- so you are taking big money out of the equation. Also, who knows if the planes can get people here. The weather has made that tough around the country and right now I am seeing less bodies than I normally do."
But how are the bodies he is seeing sizing up the game? For Rood's take, as well as many others, I spanned the world of wiseguys (and gals). I spoke to sharps who study stats, sharps who study trends, even the sharpest astrologist I know, Courtney Roberts, who truly uses her celestial power for good by examining the stars to predict outcomes -- against the spread!
So here we go:
Matchup: Pittsburgh Steelers vs. Green Bay Packers
Line moves: Packers opened as 2.5-point (-110) favorites, currently 2.5 (-120) in most places. Some books are offering Steelers plus-3 (-115) 
Total: Opened at 44, moved quickly to 46 overnight, now down to 44.5.
Geoff Kulesa, founder of wunderdogsports.com: "I don't think this is a slam dunk for the Packers. But I do think they have the edge. What I did in this Super Bowl is look at four things: how Pittsburgh's offense performed against defenses similar to Green Bay's, how Pittsburgh's defense performed against offense's similar to Green Bay's and then vice versa. Both of these teams are mirror images, No. 1 and 2 in defense in points allowed and close to each other points produced: Green Bay is 10th and Pittsburgh is 12th. But in the second half of the season, Green Bay gave up fewer points than Pittsburgh. Against great defenses like Green Bay's, Pittsburgh produced 18.2 points per game. Green Bay's offense against great defenses got 20.3 points per game. Pittsburgh's D against similar offenses to Green Bay's allowed 15.3. Based on these numbers you would expect Green Bay to score in the range of 18 points. Now look at Green Bay's defense against similar offenses to Pittsburgh and they held those teams to 7.8 ppg. They totally shut down offenses similar to Pittsburgh. If you believe that, a sample of five or six games, Pittsburgh might struggle to score here. I don't see the Steelers getting more than 20 points. Actually 17. I can see a 21-17 game here. This analysis pointed me to say Green Bay has the advantage."
Dan Fabrizio, founder of Sportsinsights.com, the sports handicapping info site dedicated to examining contrarian views: "This is a really evenly bet game, it has been sitting around 51 percent or 52 percent at all the books, whether they are square or sharp. Usually there is some kind of opinion on a game like this because of the extra week and the media discussing it constantly. But there's just not a lot of one-way action. It's really evenly split within 5 percent at every book. Bookmakers will tell you they are trying to handicap the way the action is going to come in, not the game itself. So they were expecting a lot of Green Bay money and handicapped it that way, which is why we are so excited about the value in Pittsburgh. We're definitely coming out with Pittsburgh as our side because of the value. You can get some plus-3 out there at minus-120, I really think this line should be a pick. I don't mind paying the price for a number like three. I am thinking by the time kickoff comes it will be all threes across the board."
Jay Rood, bookmaker at The Mirage: "Right now we are Green Bay minus-2.5 (-120). I have actually been playing with the juice a little bit, moving it up and down, to see where the money comes in so I can spot some trends. Right now we are getting more Steelers bets by a 2-1 margin. And from this point forward I think we will see a little more Steeler money. Not a ton, but some. Early on we got a lot of sharp Packer money, when it was minus-2.5 (-110). Same with the under in the total. The public is coming out and betting the over when we are sitting at 44 or 44.5, but every time I move it to 45 the sharps come back and pound the under."
Paul Bessire of predictionmachine.com, which simulates the game 50,000 times: "We like the Packers to win in this scenario 22-19, 60.5 percent of the time they win straight up and they cover 56 percent of the time. We love that they get the number under three points because that will happen 6 percent of the time. I think it will come down to who makes the bigger plays on passing defense and Green Bay will win because of that. According to our evaluations right now, Pittsburgh's offensive line is its greatest weakness and would give up a sack on about 9 percent of passing plays, tied with the Carolina Panthers for second-worst in the league. It's a huge opportunity to exploit a weakness. The Packers' defense gets a sack on about 9 percent of passing plays, second-best, which is tied with the Steelers. Although the advantage for Green Bay there is that the Packers' O-line gives up a sack on only about 6 percent of passing plays."
Fezzik, two-time winner of the Hilton handicapping contest: "Anyone who is making the line on this game can see that Green Bay is a 13-3 caliber team. It had a difficult schedule and the ball bounced badly for them a couple of times. They are a little bit better than Pittsburgh is. But the Packers have a suspect running game and the Steelers have experience, so I like the line as it stands. It is correct. If you could have gotten Green Bay at pick you'd like that and if you can eventually get Pittsburgh plus-3 at -110, you'd jump on that. But right now, the way it's priced, there is no great advantage."
Courtney Roberts, astrologist and founder of her own handicapping site: "It's Mike Tomlin who ends the game in the best planetary condition; his Pisces Sun and Moon setting in the west with Uranus, watery and mysterious in Pisces, followed right behind by a fiery, dramatic combination of the Moon conjunct Jupiter in early Aries. Mike McCarthy's really locked into the game chart/planetary pattern, just like Tomlin and Big Ben, but in a more difficult and restricted way. That's pretty typical of what you see in these big games: a tight nexus of planetary connections that brings such disparate souls together, locked in mortal combat, at this fateful moment in time. For McCarthy, the Aquarius Sun-Mars conjunction is separating from a conjunction with his natal Saturn (16 Aquarius), and square (90-degree angle) to his natal Sun-Mercury in Scorpio. It's also square Rodgers' Moon in Scorpio (Rodgers' Moon is very close to McCarthy's Sun-Mercury -- go figure.) Too much Saturn (limits, restrictions) and too many squares for my taste."

3 Plays Tonight

We had a goodnight last going 2-1. I also went 4-2 with peoples email questions.

Tonight-
In the NBA I like Phoenix +2.





In a smaller play I like Memphis -13.5.


NCAA-


1 Play Penn -11.

Thursday, February 3, 2011

3 Plays Today NCAA

 Northern Arizona  -8.5



Washington St.     -2.5



Portland                  +4

Wednesday, February 2, 2011

1 NBA & 4 NCAA Plays




NBA-I like Minnesota +2.5 in this, but only as a smaller play.

NCAA-
UTEP-6.5
Mizzou-6
BYU-15
Drake+8

Tuesday, February 1, 2011

3 Plays Today. 1 NBA 2 NCAA



First Play is The Hornets -9

       NCAA-
I like Kansas laying 13.





I really like FSU laying 18.5









Let's keep this hot streak going.

75% Last Week! NBA 3-2 NCAA 6-1

We hit 75 percent of our plays last week. That's an amazing week, let's keep your bookie on his toes. Check back for an NBA play tonight.

Monday, January 31, 2011

A post by Teddy Covers

Super Bowl Props: Sharp money report 
By Teddy Covers 

Sharps are not loading up on either side for this game. They loved Green Bay at pick 'em, they loved Pittsburgh at +3. Now that the pointspread has settled between the two numbers, we're seeing lukewarm support for both sides, perhaps a notch or two more on the Packers side. 

We definitely saw a bevy of sharps pounding the Under when it hit 46 last week; now down to 44 or 44.5. Sharps love the Dom Capers vs. Dick LeBeau defensive coordinator matchup with extra time to prepare. And we've seen Unders cash in five of the last six Super Bowls. The Steelers vs. Cardinals Super Bowl was the only recent exception, and that game was a dead nuts Under until a wild final five minutes. 

Enough with the side and total! The real story about the Super Bowl comes from the plethora of proposition wagers available to wager on. For the sake of brevity, I'm going to concentrate on prop bets that are A.) at the Hilton and B.) were bet hard when the Hilton opened their numbers last week. Jay Kornegay and his staff are the industry leaders when it comes to Super Bowl props. I’ll happily give them the attention they deserve here. 

Aaron Rodgers got bet up for his rushing numbers. Rodgers’ first rush of the game Over 4.5 yards took money, as did the Over 18.5 rushing yards for the game. Bettors expect him to scramble out of the pocket against LeBeau's blitzes effectively, like he's done all year. 

There was also some upwards pressure on Rodgers at O/U 18.5 completions. The thought process goes like this: Pittsburgh had the best defense in the NFL at avoiding explosive plays – no team in the NFL allowed fewer plays of 20 yards or more this year. We can expect Rodgers to have to throw underneath which equals more completions, not more yardage. The yardage prop (O/U 274.5) has not moved nearly as much as the “Over completions” has moved. 

Jordy Nelson is attracting quite a bit of wise guy support at O/U 40.5 yards and O/U 3.5 catches. Again, the season long numbers suggest a bet on the Under, but current form demands a play on the Over. In two playoff games: Nelson has eight and four catches, for 79 and 67 yards. Like Green Bay's defense, the Steelers have shown vulnerability to third and fourth receivers with their blitzing schemes. 

James Starks Over 16 carries. Bettors watched Starks unable to gain yardage or first downs as Green Bay struggled to run out the clock against the Bears in the NFC Championship Game. And they know that the Steelers had the No. 1 rushing defense in the NFL this year. That's why Starks Over 49.5 yards hasn't attracted as much attention as his number of carries. Green Bay is favored, so Starks should get his fair share of carries in the second half if the Packers try to run out the clock. In three playoff games, he's had 23, 25 and 22 rushing attempts, despite only getting 29 for the entire regular season. Bettors expect that current form to continue. 

Heath Miller -23.5 receiving yards vs. John Kuhn: Money poured in on Miller: 23.5 -120, then 26.5 -120, then 28.5 -120. Money also came on Heath Miller over 37.5 receiving yards for the game. Green Bay’s defense is vulnerable to big days from opposing tight ends – their secondary does a dynamite job containing first and second receivers, but not so good against the tight ends going over the middle. 

Ben Roethlisberger first half passing yards vs. second half passing yards: This line opened pick -120 on the second half, and immediately got hit with heavy money on the 2nd half. The thought process here is two-fold: Green Bay is favored and Pitt came out running vs. the Jets. Green Bay favored means that they should be leading at halftime, forcing Pittsburgh into a more pass heavy attack. Pittsburgh ran against the Jets and it worked, so expect a similar gameplan here resulting in fewer Roethlisberger pass attempts (and therefore passing yards) in the first half. 

Every year, wise guys lay heavy juice on props that the squares love to hit at plus prices. The classic here is the “Will there be overtime?” The “No” has cashed every year since the Super Bowl started. Squares bet the “Yes” every year looking for the long shot score. Sharps happily lay -1100 to win $100 on the “No”. 

Sharps bet the “No” on “Will Troy Polamalu record an interception” at -300. Polamalu is not going to be 100%; he was basically a non-factor in the first two playoff games. This is another type of heavy juice prop that professional bettors are willing to lay, while squares look for the plus price on the “Yes”. 

It's a similar story on the “Will there be a safety” prop (also a near 10:1 shot), and the “Will either team score three straight times”, with the “Yes” (what wise guys bet) at -175 and the “No” at a nice plus price. Sharps also look to bet “Shortest touchdown of the game under 1.5 yards”, while squares bet that same prop Over 1.5 yards, even though it tends to be priced in the -115 range. 

We've seen sharp money coming in on “Different Packers with a rushing attempt” Over 4. Green Bay's last eight games saw four with four rushers and four with five rushers. Those are very different recent numbers compared to their full season numbers. James Starks, Aaron Rodgers, John Kuhn and Brandon Jackson are virtual locks to get at least one carry, so this bet becomes something of a free roll: one end around or reverse and Over tickets cash. Pittsburgh was lined at 4.5 rushers; not taking anywhere near the same amount of Over money. 

Some books opened Packers and Steelers O/U 6.5 different players with a reception. Hilton opened that prop O/U 7.5. Needless to say, the books that opened 6.5 are now Over -200 or higher. 

Player to get first reception: Mike Wallace vs. Greg Jennings. Jennings got bet hard, now a heavy favorite. Current form shows a dramatic decline from Wallace in the playoffs, catching only four passes in Pittsburgh’s two wins. Meanwhile, the Packers targeted Jennings with their first two plays from scrimmage in the NFC Championship, and he finished the game with eight receptions for the second consecutive week. 
Let's not forget those punters! Tim Masthay of Green Bay took some $$ with his longest punt Over 54.5 yards bet up to 55 -130 right from the get-go. Masthay also took some “no touchback” money, even at -200. He only had five touchbacks all year, compared to 25 punts downed inside the 20. 

3 NBA Plays Today.

I have 3 plays on Monday night. One strong play on Indiana -8.5. Two regular plays Heat -17.5 and The Mavericks -10.

Sunday, January 30, 2011